-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
what about an eclipse-plugin? I am currently working on doing a JSR-77 client for eclipse (will post something on Sunday). I personally favor to have the console integrated in the ide. I do understand though, that eclipse is not everybodys choice. Cheers, Mariano On Friday 21 November 2003 19:11, Matthew David Kurjanowicz wrote: > Oh oh, pick me! pick me! :) I really think that this is a good idea, and > a good alternative (for me developing) to the twiddle comand client. > There are a few things there that I've been trying to figure out there > that just aren't working dealing with the twiddle cli - such as keeping > track of state, etc. Besides, I have more experience developing swing > UI's then CLI interfaces. > > I'm willing to lead work on a swing console, and hopefully will be able to > extend James' code. I started looking at it last night and it looks > doable. > > Hoeffenlich geht es gut. (And that's the extent of my memory of HS Deutsch > > :) ). > > -Matt K. > > > Cool, James. That's great news. MVC is perfect for thick-client UIs, > > too : ) Now everyone who wants to scratch that itch can do so (ich habe > > es genug f�r mich gekratzt). > > > > It sounds like Matt and Ryan are already thinking a lot about this > > stuff. Does one (or both) of them want to lead the effort on developing > > the swing UI? (I'm sure James will if they won't, and will help them if > > they run across any issues). There are probably dozens of people on the > > list who want to help with the Swing UI, who have a lot of experience > > with UI design or who know JMX like the back of their hand. If not, > > this is a perfect chance for newcomers to get involved (other than > > writing unit tests) and learn some new skills. > > > > Matt and Ryan are both very competent developers and show a lot of > > initiative for pushing in this direction : ) If it sounded before like > > I was suggesting that the Geronimo project shouldn't have a swing UI, I > > apologize--you guys should know that wasn't what I was trying to say > > (and even if I were, I don't make decisions around here ; ) I never > > want to close the door on new ideas or new, useful components to plug > > in. I think that stuff is great. I was just trying to convey that I > > personally specialize in thin client servlet approaches and will stick > > with them because it's where I operate most efficiently and can make the > > best use of my time. I'd probably be more of a hindrance than a benefit > > to skilled a thick-client UI team. > > > > Again, thanks for the help and the great work, James. Best luck to Matt > > & Ryan on driving the swing effort if they choose to do so. If they > > have specific ideas down the line of ways they could reuse pieces of my > > code and want me to help abstract out bits for their use, I will do > > whatever I can to help them. -- > > N. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/vlWtSraqt+SsFIMRAlKJAJsGYIbc2pB7qQgf9cn5SdJ1V/MbqACdGs6g JUesP92W2htblsRtTUCyc/A= =kHli -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
