I think that's a good idea - maybe we could use SWT instead of Swing in general for a GUI console - I've never actually written an eclipse plugin before, but if it's already in SWT it can't be that hard to convert it to a plug-in, can it? Besides, I think that SWT looks better in general - what are the downsides to using SWT as opposed to Swing? -Matt
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mariano Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: Re: new console-swing team > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > what about an eclipse-plugin? I am currently working on doing a JSR-77 > client for eclipse (will post something on Sunday). I personally favor to > have the console integrated in the ide. I do understand though, that eclipse > is not everybodys choice. > > Cheers, > Mariano > > On Friday 21 November 2003 19:11, Matthew David Kurjanowicz wrote: > > Oh oh, pick me! pick me! :) I really think that this is a good idea, and > > a good alternative (for me developing) to the twiddle comand client. > > There are a few things there that I've been trying to figure out there > > that just aren't working dealing with the twiddle cli - such as keeping > > track of state, etc. Besides, I have more experience developing swing > > UI's then CLI interfaces. > > > > I'm willing to lead work on a swing console, and hopefully will be able to > > extend James' code. I started looking at it last night and it looks > > doable. > > > > Hoeffenlich geht es gut. (And that's the extent of my memory of HS Deutsch > > > > :) ). > > > > -Matt K. > > > > > Cool, James. That's great news. MVC is perfect for thick-client UIs, > > > too : ) Now everyone who wants to scratch that itch can do so (ich habe > > > es genug f�r mich gekratzt). > > > > > > It sounds like Matt and Ryan are already thinking a lot about this > > > stuff. Does one (or both) of them want to lead the effort on developing > > > the swing UI? (I'm sure James will if they won't, and will help them if > > > they run across any issues). There are probably dozens of people on the > > > list who want to help with the Swing UI, who have a lot of experience > > > with UI design or who know JMX like the back of their hand. If not, > > > this is a perfect chance for newcomers to get involved (other than > > > writing unit tests) and learn some new skills. > > > > > > Matt and Ryan are both very competent developers and show a lot of > > > initiative for pushing in this direction : ) If it sounded before like > > > I was suggesting that the Geronimo project shouldn't have a swing UI, I > > > apologize--you guys should know that wasn't what I was trying to say > > > (and even if I were, I don't make decisions around here ; ) I never > > > want to close the door on new ideas or new, useful components to plug > > > in. I think that stuff is great. I was just trying to convey that I > > > personally specialize in thin client servlet approaches and will stick > > > with them because it's where I operate most efficiently and can make the > > > best use of my time. I'd probably be more of a hindrance than a benefit > > > to skilled a thick-client UI team. > > > > > > Again, thanks for the help and the great work, James. Best luck to Matt > > > & Ryan on driving the swing effort if they choose to do so. If they > > > have specific ideas down the line of ways they could reuse pieces of my > > > code and want me to help abstract out bits for their use, I will do > > > whatever I can to help them. -- > > > N. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/vlWtSraqt+SsFIMRAlKJAJsGYIbc2pB7qQgf9cn5SdJ1V/MbqACdGs6g > JUesP92W2htblsRtTUCyc/A= > =kHli > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >
