I'm confused; there's code out there, and you added your Wiki
comments to the page that describes the code. What are your questions
about the direction?
I will note that the general movement seems to be to allow
individual services to do their own thing, which if applied in this case
would render all validation except for EAR validation irrelevant to
Geronimo. But no one's really objected to Geronimo having a comprehensive
validator, and IMHO it would be nice to produce consistent error messages
regardless of the EJB or Web implementation, etc.
Aaron
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, David Farb wrote:
> I am new to Geronimo, and new to Apache as a contributor, although I have
> used Apache servers in the past. I would like to get involved in the
> validation logic, specifically EJB's etc.
>
> I posted some requirements to the Wiki, and will probably do some more. I
> have yet to study the existing code in any detail, so I am just beginning
> here.
>
> Is any one else out there working on validation? If so what is your
> direction/inclination?
>
> Thanks
> David Farb
>
>
