Sorry if I was not clear. The question isn't the direction of Geronimo or the code, the question was what parts of validation is anyone else doing.
I would like to start on EJB validatin, but if there are two of us working on EJB's, one of us is wasting his/her time. That was really my question. Who is already working on validation, and what are they doing? As to consistency, I am very much in favor, which is yet another reason to try to coordinate activity. David Farb > > I'm confused; there's code out there, and you added your Wiki > comments to the page that describes the code. What are your questions > about the direction? > > I will note that the general movement seems to be to allow > individual services to do their own thing, which if applied in this case > would render all validation except for EAR validation irrelevant to > Geronimo. But no one's really objected to Geronimo having a > comprehensive > validator, and IMHO it would be nice to produce consistent error messages > regardless of the EJB or Web implementation, etc. > > Aaron > > On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, David Farb wrote: > > I am new to Geronimo, and new to Apache as a contributor, > although I have > > used Apache servers in the past. I would like to get involved in the > > validation logic, specifically EJB's etc. > > > > I posted some requirements to the Wiki, and will probably do > some more. I > > have yet to study the existing code in any detail, so I am just > beginning > > here. > > > > Is any one else out there working on validation? If so what is your > > direction/inclination? > > > > Thanks > > David Farb > > > > >
