<howl of protest>I would rather you used one less level so we don't
have to rewrite all of top level maven.xml to include it in the normal
build. </howl of protest>
david jencks
On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 01:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
If no one objects then, I'm going to go with :
/geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
and get things in there and working so others can play. Right now,
it's just read-only, but still vaguely useful.
I'll wait a bit for any agreement or howls of protest.
geir
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:09 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
We've got the following:
CLI console
Swing console
Web console
JMX debugging console
So perhaps we should have:
/geronimo/applications/console/cli
/geronimo/applications/console/swing
/geronimo/applications/console/web
/geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
Can they all be classified as applications? I know the two web apps
can--if the
other two can as well I'm game for an "applications" branch : ) We
should also
consider how to name the .WAR files for the two web applications in
this list.
I guess "jmx-debug.war" and "server-management.war" might work out.
So you'd
have "...8080/jmx-debug/" and "...8080/server-management/"
I'm happy with however you guys decide to name these, as long as they
make some
logical sense to the users and aren't any more verbose than is
necessary.
--
N. Alex Rupp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: velocity-based debug console
I think we need a new naming convention. The console-<type> was
designed with the idea that we would have a single console of each
type
(e.g., console-web, console-gui, console-cli). Now the new stuff is
not a management console, just a debug tool, so console-<type>
doesn't
really fit. Instead debug-web, would fit better, unfortunately that
name implies it is a debug tool for web applications, which it
definitely is not. This is why I think we need a new naming
convention.
Also Jeremy suggested the other day that we put these modules into a
new applications "modules-tree" (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-web
becomes geronimo/applications/console-web/). Another idea is to use
a
two level deep tree (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-debug becomes
geronimo/applications/console/web/).
What ever we decide, I think we need to readdress the naming
convention
for applications.
-dain
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
