ok- how about we punt on the A/B/C and just do
/geronimo/applications/jmx-debug-web
or such?
On Feb 16, 2004, at 6:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 02:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 16, 2004, at 5:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
<howl of protest>I would rather you used one less level so we don't have to rewrite all of top level maven.xml to include it in the normal build. </howl of protest>
Why would you have to rewrite?
It might not be as bad as I fear, but currently maven.xml is designed to build sub projects in ./A/B (A == specs, modules, B== connector, kernel, etc). adding another "A" type is trivial. Adding another layer (/A/B/C) will take some study to do.
thanks david jencks
david jencks
On Monday, February 16, 2004, at 01:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
If no one objects then, I'm going to go with :
/geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
and get things in there and working so others can play. Right now, it's just read-only, but still vaguely useful.
I'll wait a bit for any agreement or howls of protest.
geir
On Feb 15, 2004, at 11:09 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
We've got the following:
CLI console Swing console Web console JMX debugging console
So perhaps we should have:
/geronimo/applications/console/cli /geronimo/applications/console/swing /geronimo/applications/console/web /geronimo/applications/console/jmx-debug
Can they all be classified as applications? I know the two web apps can--if the
other two can as well I'm game for an "applications" branch : ) We should also
consider how to name the .WAR files for the two web applications in this list.
I guess "jmx-debug.war" and "server-management.war" might work out. So you'd
have "...8080/jmx-debug/" and "...8080/server-management/"
I'm happy with however you guys decide to name these, as long as they make some
logical sense to the users and aren't any more verbose than is necessary.
-- N. Alex Rupp
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 1:24 PM Subject: Re: velocity-based debug console
I think we need a new naming convention. The console-<type> was
designed with the idea that we would have a single console of each type
(e.g., console-web, console-gui, console-cli). Now the new stuff is
not a management console, just a debug tool, so console-<type> doesn't
really fit. Instead debug-web, would fit better, unfortunately that
name implies it is a debug tool for web applications, which it
definitely is not. This is why I think we need a new naming
convention.
Also Jeremy suggested the other day that we put these modules into a
new applications "modules-tree" (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-web
becomes geronimo/applications/console-web/). Another idea is to use a
two level deep tree (e.g. geronimo/modules/console-debug becomes
geronimo/applications/console/web/).
What ever we decide, I think we need to readdress the naming convention
for applications.
-dain
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
