Attention is currently required from: pespin, lynxis lazus, dexter.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704 )

Change subject: abis_rsl: when doing packet access, log t1,t3,t2 and fn
......................................................................


Patch Set 7:

(2 comments)

Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704/comment/66076f67_e4989521
PS7, Line 9: the
.


File src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704/comment/e011c545_c8a983bd
PS7, Line 1822:                 LOG_BTS(rqd->bts, DRSL, LOGL_INFO, "CHAN RQD: 
fn(t1=%u,t3=%u,t2=%u) = %u\n", t1, t3, t2, fn);
re: why not in the order t1, t2, t3?
you hint at a comment, i assume you mean this one:

"
The order T1, T2, T3 is intentional. That is the order in which the numbers are 
stored and also the order in which wireshark will display the values. When 
debuging it is easier when one does not have to convert between different 
display variants.

The fn is displayed at later log lines as well, no need to display it here once 
more. (it is important to see T1, T2, T3 since wireshark won't always do the 
conversion.)
"

The confusion is not gone, your comment says 1,2,3 while the code says 1,3,2. 
Is wireshark showing 1,3,2?



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I83d20ba9e0ce6488d458ccf4a85c8445c30e3a89
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29704
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:29:10 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to