Attention is currently required from: pespin.

fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236 )

Change subject: Merge gsm_network into gsm_bts_sm and place gsm_bts under it
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(5 comments)

File src/common/bts.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/489e1cde_858a2437
PS4, Line 406: g_bts_sm->num_bts++;
I find this weird that a BTS is added to `&g_bts_sm->bts_list` in 
`gsm_bts_alloc()`, but `g_bts_sm->num_bts` is incremented here. Any reason why 
not doing both in a single place?


File src/common/bts_sm.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/5db95b4f_626a08c0
PS4, Line 37: talloc_free
talloc does free() all its children anyway, do we really need to do this 
manually?


File src/common/oml.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/303c0b76_a4442e9a
PS4, Line 154:  if (!bts) {
`OSMO_UNLIKELY`?


File src/common/pcu_sock.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/f3386730_2dd687d2
PS4, Line 897: struct gsm_bts_sm *bts_sm
Can we remove this argument since `g_bts_sm` is available globally?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236/comment/cbdf3323_bafcfcd0
PS4, Line 957: struct gsm_bts_sm *bts_sm
Can we remove this argument since `g_bts_sm` is available globally?



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32236
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ideb0d458ec631008223f861cf8b46d09524a1a21
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32236
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:07 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to