Attention is currently required from: fixeria, dexter.

falconia has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32740 )

Change subject: gsm630: make osmo_hr_check_sid compatible with RFC 5993
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32740/comment/4718014e_019ba0b1
PS1, Line 7: gsm630: make osmo_hr_check_sid compatible with RFC 5993
I assume you meant gsm620 here.


Patchset:

PS1:
I am not certain at all that the right solution to OS#5688 is to propagate the 
knowledge of two different RTP formats deep into the innards of our code. 
Wouldn't it be much cleaner to check the RTP encoding format at the very 
beginning of RTP input processing in OsmoBTS (or in OsmoMGW feeding E1 Abis), 
in the same place where calls to osmo_{fr,efr}_sid_preen() have been inserted 
recently, strip the extraneous RFC 5993 ToC octet if one is present, and then 
work only with the TS 101 318 format internally throughout our code base? And 
in the other direction, if the desire is to emit RFC 5993 format to the outside 
world (configurable per vty, ideally), likewise work in TS 101 318 format 
internally, but prepend the extra ToC octet just before RTP output.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32740
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I25728299b757fbc87dd1b3f5adaec9b8b240c5d1
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32740
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: falconia <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 14:19:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to