Attention is currently required from: laforge, neels, pespin.

dexter has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35212?usp=email )

Change subject: ecu: force alignment of member data in struct osmo_ecu_state
......................................................................


Patch Set 6:

(1 comment)

File src/codec/ecu_fr.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35212/comment/204ef9d4_51209530
PS5, Line 315:  struct fr_ecu_state *fr = (struct fr_ecu_state *) st;
> Here and in the function below is where you need container_of: […]
Thanks. I have added this now as suggested, but I still do not understand where 
the advantage is. container_of gets st, which is of type osmo_ecu_state but 
when calling container_of we specify it as struct fr_ecu_state. And we request 
the container address of the member ecu_state, which is struct fr_ecu_state. I 
see that this works but I do not see any practical advantage. We still need to 
have the ecu_state member in struct fr_ecu_state.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35212?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I28672856e8e8f47e04ffe09ee3e07b577108cdc7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35212
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 11:27:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to