Attention is currently required from: pespin. fixeria has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38309?usp=email )
Change subject: s1gw: use the new counter name (out_pkt.forward.unmodified) ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File s1gw/S1GW_Tests.ttcn: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38309/comment/5cb048d4_f9eb5383?usp=email : PS1, Line 206: {name := mp_statsd_prefix & "ctr.s1ap.proxy.out_pkt.forward.unmodified.value", mtype := "c", min := 2, max := 2} > this change of name looks weird to me tbh. […] I changed it because it looked more logical to have it together with other `out_pkt` counters. We're taking decision on the incoming PDUs -- this is right, but the counter tells that the outgoing PDU was basically an incoming PDU without modifications. Does that make sense? I could move it back to `in_pkt`, but then `S1GW_CTR_S1AP_PROXY_IN_PKT_REPLY_ERAB_SETUP_RSP` looks confusing as if the input packet was a reply. Alternatively, we could remove the IN/OUT classification? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38309?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I037fea187bb78ba0d4b82d30915c5270d4cd28bb Gerrit-Change-Number: 38309 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <[email protected]> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:59:30 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
