Pau Espin Pedrol has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12199 )

Change subject: gsm29118: add generator functions for GSM29118 messages
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(6 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c
File src/gsm/gsm29118.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c@186
PS1, Line 186: /* Allocate an empty message buffer, suitable to hold a complite 
SGsAP msg. */
typo: complete?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c@191
PS1, Line 191:  return msgb_alloc_headroom(1024, 128, "SGsAP");
So 512 seems far more reasonable, right?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c@207
PS1, Line 207:          len = 55;
Probably makes sense to at least print an error if strlen(name) > 55 in this 
case.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c@219
PS1, Line 219:  msgb_tlv_put(msg, SGSAP_IE_IMSI, len - 2, buf + 2);
why not using msgb_put() if we already have the whole TLV in buf? because the 
TAG is different?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c@227
PS1, Line 227:  msgb_tlv_put(msg, SGSAP_IE_LAI, 5, (uint8_t *) & lai_enc);
sizeof(lai_enc) instead of 5 probably?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12199/1/src/gsm/gsm29118.c@251
PS1, Line 251: struct msgb *gsm29118_create_dl_ud(const char *imsi, struct msgb 
*nas_msg)
does it make sense to require a msgb here API-wise? probably a pointer + len 
makes more sense. This way if caller doesn't have a msgb doesn't need to create 
an extra one.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12199
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic87f8a771b87b52215d0a7451b67794557b80b8a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 12199
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002)
Gerrit-CC: Pau Espin Pedrol <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 12:06:03 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No

Reply via email to