Dear Yves I could understand that model object have no restriction for mesh dimension. I'll tried to use it. I will ask you a question if there is an uncertain point.
Thank you for your support and development. GetFEM++ is very useful. Best Regards, Tetsuo 2019年2月5日(火) 17:20 Yves Renard <[email protected]>: > > > Dear Tetsuo, > > The ability to couple problems defined on meshes of different dimensions > is one of the strenght of GetFEM. > You can indeed handle meshes of different dimensions in a single model. > If you have some variables defined only on a boundary, you can add some > weak form terms on that boundary. If you have a different mesh there, > you can add the coupling terms using the interpolation transformations. > And if you want to solve some sub-parts of your model, in order for > instance to solve you global model in an fixed point way, this is also > possible to make some partial solve (you can disable some variables to > freeze them). > > Best Regards, > > Yves > > > > Le 05/02/2019 à 08:22, Tetsuo Koyama a écrit : > > Dear GetFEM++ project > > > > Hello. Now, I'm making 2D mesh model which have 1D mesh model in LEFT, > > RIGHT and TOP side. > > I have to solve 1D mesh model and solve 2D mesh model by using 1D mesh > > model result. > > I know that GetFEM++ couldn't solve different dimension model in one > > object. So I made 4 model object and tried to move 1D mesh model > > object result to 2D mesh model object result. But, it is a little > > bothering to take correspondence between 2 model object. > > > > Is there any good way to solve the probelm? > > > > Best Regard Tetsuo, > > > > -- > > Yves Renard ([email protected]) tel : (33) 04.72.43.87.08 > INSA-Lyon > 20, rue Albert Einstein > 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE > http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard > > --------- >
