Dear Tetsuo, If you edit this page you can also remove the reference to "boost intrusive_ptr <http://www.boost.org/libs/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.html>". We use standard shared_ptr now. You could also add some mention to projected_fem which is the same as interpolated_fem but performing a projection on a surface instead of an interpolation within a volume.
BR Kostas On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:28 AM Tetsuo Koyama <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Yves > > I think it is good to add this information to > > mixed methods with different meshes in > http://getfem.org/userdoc/interNMM.html > > If I could have agreement, I'll add it myself. > Could you give a comment? > > Best Regards, > > Tetsuo > > 2019年2月5日(火) 19:09 Tetsuo Koyama <[email protected]>: > > > > Dear Yves > > > > Thank very much you for your answer. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Tetsuo > > > > 2019年2月5日(火) 19:05 Yves Renard <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Dear Tetsuo, > > > > > > The standard way in GetFEM is to define a fem in the whole domain and > use > > > > > > md.add_filtered_fem_variable(name, mf, region) > > > > > > where region is the boundary. This will select the degrees of freedom > whose shape function is non-zero on the given region. > > > > > > You can either select the degrees of freedom yourself and use a > "partial_mesh_fem". > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yves > > > > > > > > > Le 05/02/2019 à 10:52, Tetsuo Koyama a écrit : > > > > > > Dear Yves > > > > > > I'm searching to how to make MeshFem on left and right and top mesh > > > border region in user document, but I couldn't find it. > > > Where can I get information about that? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Tetsuo > > > > > > 2019年2月5日(火) 18:02 Tetsuo Koyama <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Dear Yves > > > > > > I could understand that model object have no restriction for mesh > dimension. > > > I'll tried to use it. I will ask you a question if there is an > uncertain point. > > > > > > Thank you for your support and development. GetFEM++ is very useful. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Tetsuo > > > > > > 2019年2月5日(火) 17:20 Yves Renard <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Dear Tetsuo, > > > > > > The ability to couple problems defined on meshes of different > dimensions > > > is one of the strenght of GetFEM. > > > You can indeed handle meshes of different dimensions in a single model. > > > If you have some variables defined only on a boundary, you can add some > > > weak form terms on that boundary. If you have a different mesh there, > > > you can add the coupling terms using the interpolation transformations. > > > And if you want to solve some sub-parts of your model, in order for > > > instance to solve you global model in an fixed point way, this is also > > > possible to make some partial solve (you can disable some variables to > > > freeze them). > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yves > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 05/02/2019 à 08:22, Tetsuo Koyama a écrit : > > > > > > Dear GetFEM++ project > > > > > > Hello. Now, I'm making 2D mesh model which have 1D mesh model in LEFT, > > > RIGHT and TOP side. > > > I have to solve 1D mesh model and solve 2D mesh model by using 1D mesh > > > model result. > > > I know that GetFEM++ couldn't solve different dimension model in one > > > object. So I made 4 model object and tried to move 1D mesh model > > > object result to 2D mesh model object result. But, it is a little > > > bothering to take correspondence between 2 model object. > > > > > > Is there any good way to solve the probelm? > > > > > > Best Regard Tetsuo, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Yves Renard ([email protected]) tel : (33) > 04.72.43.87.08 > > > INSA-Lyon > > > 20, rue Albert Einstein > > > 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE > > > http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard > > > > > > --------- > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Yves Renard ([email protected]) tel : (33) > 04.72.43.87.08 > > > INSA-Lyon > > > 20, rue Albert Einstein > > > 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE > > > http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard > > > > > > --------- > >
