Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2020, 14:08:06 CET schrieb Anton Ertl: > We use CSET internally, so we may add a word with its current > functionality, but a different name. The convention would be to call > it SET, but I don't want to waste this name on a little-used word; > maybe MASK-SET or OR! would be appropriate names.
I'm for this set: : or! ( x addr -- ) >r r@ @ or r> ! ; : xor! ( x addr -- ) >r r@ @ xor r> ! ; : and! ( x addr -- ) >r r@ @ and r> ! ; : xorc! ( x c-addr -- ) >r r@ c@ xor r> c! ; : andc! ( x c-addr -- ) >r r@ c@ and r> c! ; : orc! ( x c-addr -- ) >r r@ c@ or r> c! ; -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" net2o id: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ* https://net2o.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
