On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:36:21PM +0100, Bernd Paysan wrote: > Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2020, 14:08:06 CET schrieb Anton Ertl: > > We use CSET internally, so we may add a word with its current > > functionality, but a different name. The convention would be to call > > it SET, but I don't want to waste this name on a little-used word; > > maybe MASK-SET or OR! would be appropriate names. > > I'm for this set: > > : or! ( x addr -- ) >r r@ @ or r> ! ; > : xor! ( x addr -- ) >r r@ @ xor r> ! ; > : and! ( x addr -- ) >r r@ @ and r> ! ;
I have now removed CSET CRESET CTOGGLE (may be added after a cooldown period if there is demand), and added OR! (used in exactly one place in Gforth), but not XOR! AND! (not used). > : xorc! ( x c-addr -- ) >r r@ c@ xor r> c! ; > : andc! ( x c-addr -- ) >r r@ c@ and r> c! ; > : orc! ( x c-addr -- ) >r r@ c@ or r> c! ; Given that we have C+!, CXOR! CAND! COR! are better names. Or we reintroduce CTOGGLE CRESET and CSET after the cooldown. - anton
