Andreas Beck wrote:
> Marcus will be extremely grateful, if you can take out the SYNC mode stuff
> from XGGI. I know he doesn't like SYNC mode much, much less than I actually,
> and if he didn't manage to get XGGI running ASYNC, that tells a story.
>
> But anyway: GO FOR IT ! Someone should finally try it. When this is in, and
> does decently grained refreshing, this will boost XGGI on any inherently
> asynchronous target (like tile or X itself).
For the next release of the current XGGI I'll probably switch to
ASYNC mode and do an explicit ggiFlush() in XGGI's own timer tick
(which runs in 20ms intervals - I'll probably flush every second tick).
This won't make a big (if any) difference performance-wise, but it will
remove the need for helper-mansync and associated problems.
//Marcus
--
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Marcus Sundberg | http://www.stacken.kth.se/~mackan/
Royal Institute of Technology | Phone: +46 707 295404
Stockholm, Sweden | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]