Andreas Beck wrote:
> Marcus will be extremely grateful, if you can take out the SYNC mode stuff
> from XGGI. I know he doesn't like SYNC mode much, much less than I actually,
> and if he didn't manage to get XGGI running ASYNC, that tells a story.
> 
> But anyway: GO FOR IT ! Someone should finally try it. When this is in, and
> does decently grained refreshing, this will boost XGGI on any inherently
> asynchronous target (like tile or X itself).

For the next release of the current XGGI I'll probably switch to
ASYNC mode and do an explicit ggiFlush() in XGGI's own timer tick
(which runs in 20ms intervals - I'll probably flush every second tick).

This won't make a big (if any) difference performance-wise, but it will
remove the need for helper-mansync and associated problems.

//Marcus
-- 
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
        Marcus Sundberg        | http://www.stacken.kth.se/~mackan/
 Royal Institute of Technology |       Phone: +46 707 295404
       Stockholm, Sweden       |   E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to