"Jon M. Taylor" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Steffen Seeger wrote:
>
> > "Robert S. Maier" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Jon and other GGI folks. I haven't been sending anything to your list
> > > (I've just been lurking), but being the maintainer of GNU libxmi, I thought
> > > I ought to do so now.
> >
> > So you (and Jon) might be the right people to ask this question:
> >
> > Does libXMI work out of the box as an replacement to the MI code in the
> > X11R6.4 sample implementation (with XFree enhancements)?
>
> Out of the box? No, for the simple reason that I had to modify
> the API calls to take an additional ggi_visual_t pointer as their first
> argument. I have also altered the miPixmap datatype and removed the
> miBitmap datatype. The majority of the rest remains the same, though.
I am asking because now that I have the PhoeniX framework in CVS and compiling,
I wanted to add a DDX driver t for a simple framebuffer X on kgi-0.9.
The thing I was wondering about was if I could use libXMI as a mi replacement
for PhoeniX, and investing into an accelerated libXMI.
However, so far it looks as if I stick with my plan on getting XAA running.
Any suggestions/comments?
Steffen
_______________________________________________________________________________
Steffen Seeger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TU-Chemnitz http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sse
