> they are a good candidate for a modular design (i.e. you may want to swap > out one emulator object against another one if the client changes the > terminal type). Yep. > That shouldn't be too hard to get right. It's not trivial, but quite possible. > Most terminal programs I'v looked into are awefully messy, mostly because > they don't separate the graphics from the tty and the parser properly. *nods* > This cries for a good object oriented design ! (have a look into the > berlin code, we do have a terminal widget. What's missing is the emulator, > i.e. a pluggable parser which reads out the control sequences. Right now > we simply ignore them, i.e. all we can run are programs in canonical > mode) Get a copy of EvStack, then. It has a modular TTY layer, with xterm emulation and all. CU, ANdy -- = Andreas Beck | Email : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
- Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specification) crusius
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... Stefan Seefeld
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specific... Andreas Beck
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... crusius
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specific... Stefan Seefeld
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specific... Andreas Beck
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... Andreas Beck
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specific... Steffen Seeger
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... crusius
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... crusius
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specific... Andreas Beck
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... Lee Brown
- Re: Generic terminal (was Re: ansi x3.64 specificatio... Christoph Egger
