Antonio Campos wrote:
> People want an OS for accesing the hardware in a clean, fast and reliable way.
> That includes the graphics hardware. And I must say that this handling is one of
> the most important tasks in modern operating systems (and one of the things that
> the user sees more quickly). And this handling is one of the things that Linux
> users can't feel pride about.
> We have that strange and quite limited fbdev kernel hack, the slow and
> uncomfortable to program Xlib (DGA, DRI, etc...), and of course, an ununified way
> of handling 2D and 3D graphics...
> I hoped the GGI/KGI project filled this gap (the same way I hoped the Alsa+OpenAL
> projects would deprecate the OSS sound drivers in an unified sound system), but it
> seems to me that is not going in the right direction (I'm sorry about saying
> this).
So, in your opinion, what is wrong about the direction KGI is heading to?
Steffen
_______________________________________________________________________________
Steffen Seeger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TU-Chemnitz http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sse
