Nicolas Souchu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 06:23:19PM +0100, Steffen Seeger wrote:
> >
> > libGGI should be portable to *BSD without the need for a KGI port. If, however,
> > you are more interested in porting the KGI itself, get in contact with me.
>
> This is actually the way I'd like to proceed. As far as I could understand,
>everything
> should go very well once that done.
>
> But what would be your advice? Should I first port libggi on the FreeBSD framebuffer
> in order to understand its interfaces, or directly consider a port of KGI?
I would port libGGI first, so you have all it's applications too. Done that
I would tackle porting KGI-0.9. I would take that order because this
is probably a more complicated task, because of the kernel hacking involved.
Steffen
_______________________________________________________________________________
Steffen Seeger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TU-Chemnitz http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sse
