On Fre, 29 Dez 2000 19:52:00 Cesar Crusius wrote:
> [...]
> ggiMapColor for every pixel." think of it as a pipe. it *is* already
> implemented. it is clear to see when you rewrite
>
> *dest++ = (uint16) LIBGGIMapColor(vis, cols);
>
> as
>
> pixel = (uint16) LIBGGIMapColor(vis, cols);
> *dest++ = pixel;
>
> both lines together are ggiPackColors. the second one is
> ggiPackPixels. it is overwhelmingly trivial, but what it does, and
>
> [...]
> and when they think, they realize that everything is already
> implemented but inaccessible. and the exact same argument could be
> applied to ggiPackColors. but i rest my case, since it looks like i
> wasn't able to convince anybody ;) my position remains the same:
> either ggiPackPixels and ggiPackColors together, or none.
>
If it is such a trivial task, why don't you write a small patch and
let the whole list decide whether to apply it to cvs or not ?
> i'm done with this thread. and in december 31, turn of the millenium,
> i turn 30, as if this would matter to anyone. happy new year!
>
Congratulations and jubilations ...
Martin.
