On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:01:48PM +0100, Tijs van Bakel wrote:
> Lee Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > typedef guint ggi_cursor_t;
> >
> > typedef struct {
> > guint16 bpp;
> > guint8 width;
> > guint8 height;
> >
> > ggi_color* palette;
> >
> > void* bits;
> >
> > guint16 hot_x, hot_y;
> > } ggi_cursor;
>
> guint8 for width and height seems a little too restrictive.
> especially as hot_x and hot_y are guint16 :-)
>
> the palette is meant for indexed modes only? (shouldn't there be a
> ggi_palette for this? maintaining malloc()'s for this in different
> libraries seems like asking for bugs.)
Since the cursor is associated with a visual, shouldn't the visual's
palette be used?
John
- does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Christoph Egger
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Tijs van Bakel
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable Tijs van Bakel
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Jon M. Taylor
