> I'm totally confused. Of course, I don't know *anything* about h/w cursor > implementations, but I would assume that the cursor's pixel layout is the > same as that of the corresponding visual. For hardware cursors it usually isn't. For software ones it is. Thus I propose to specify the cursor in a generic format and let the LibOvl say, if the hardware can do it, and if it can't, you just fall back to using LibBlit and do it in Software. Of course for convenience, I'd place a layer in between that handles this transparently for me. > Having a palette for the cursor which needs to be translated Many HW cursors have their own palette. CU, ANdy -- = Andreas Beck | Email : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
- Re: does this look acceptable Tijs van Bakel
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable Tijs van Bakel
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Jon M. Taylor
- Re: does this look acceptable Brian S. Julin
- Re: does this look acceptable John McCutchan
- Re: does this look acceptable Lee Brown
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
- Re: does this look acceptable Jon M. Taylor
- Re: does this look acceptable Stefan Seefeld
- Re: does this look acceptable Andreas Beck
