Andreas Beck wrote:
> > Are we going to wait for DirectX updates before announcing
> > the release candidate?
>
> Depends on the timeframe - I'd say if it's below two weeks extra time, I'd
> rather wait. Gives much broader audience.
as much as I agree with the point you make, I think this is the same wrong
approach for the release that was holding back GGI for the last two years.
There will always be nice features to add, and you have at some point to
decide what features will be in the upcoming release and what will have to wait
for the next round. GGI hasn't seen a major release for two years at least,
and the upcoming release has been discussed (including a feature list !)
last year in November. Please do everybody a favor and just declare a feature
freeze (in fact, I thought that even back in our IRC meeting last year we decided
that only bug fixes should go into CVS before GGI 2.0)
There is a life after GGI 2.0, I assure you...
Regards,
Stefan
