On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Brian S. Julin wrote:
>
> On 7 Jul 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> > What's left to do for the 2.0 release?
>
> Bump the minor version # of LibGII/ major of LibGG; there have been changes
> that will prevent LibGGI from using libgg as old as the last release.
>
> We have to agree that no major changes or new features should
> occur until the 2.0 final week. I think the figure of 2 weeks
> for us to collect bug reports and fix them was thrown out between
> 2.0beta4 and 2.0final, everyone cool with that?
Yep.
> Then we have to apply the release tags, and then either generate
> a snapshot right then, or nobody commit anything to CVS until the
> nightly snap is taken.
Well, Eric should create the ChangeLog files for libggi and libgii.
Tagging CVS is IMO a mandatory. Just think of having broken patches
after release immediately and you want to create rpm- and
deb-packages from the release, then you can get the sources easily
without the broken patches.
John Fortin and Nicolas Souchu should add a description of their
DirectX- and VGL-target in libggi/doc/targets.txt. IMO that is no
showstopper for the 2beta4-release, but it should be in the final
release.
> Just tested again on my system and everything compiles and
> installs again.
Same for me.
> (words cannot express our gratitude for taking the build system
> under your wing.)
Same for me.
> I'm happy to see the release tag go in ASAP.
Can we determine a release-date on Tuesday 20:00 UTC? That gives
people time to test the new build environment and to send us some
last-minute fixes.
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
