On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Brian S. Julin wrote:
>
> On 11 Jul 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote
> > I won't commit these two changes nor my "make dist" fixes due to the
> > free. Let me know if you want them.
>
> OK, so last time I said this, Stefan said something I couldn't quite
> understand what he meant, and someone else agreed with him, though I
> have no idea how *they* understood what he meant, so here goes...
>
> IMHO: Committing build system and doc fixes to CVS is exactly what we
> *should* be doing right now. By codefreeze, we mean no reworking
> the architecture, adding new targets/API/features, etc. Fixing things
> is the whole point of having a freeze. So IMHO, Thayne should commit
> fixes for anything short of an overhaul of the build system as long as
> they don't break things, without having to ask, right?
>
> Now, if someone has a difference with MHO, could they please actually
> explain it?
The paragraph says everything, what I try to say in my other mails. Can't
say it better.
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
