On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:19:36AM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | The discussion about replacing abbot seems to be achieving consensus. > | There's no urgency, but if it seems to taper out again then I'll try > | prodding the committee to put the plan into action. > > What *is* the consensus?
To get a Hetzner server, and run a bunch of VMs on it for the different services. I think everyone's agreed on that, but there's some discussion about how best to handle backups. > We should get on with this. It bit several times recently, and we don't want > to wait until it becomes really serious! (And it looks bad.) Replacing abbot isn't related to the recent problems with abbot. We want to replace it because the hardware is a few years old and out of warranty, but the recent problems were software issues and would probably affect the replacement in the same way. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
