If we are migrating the GHC trac would it also be possible to upgrade it to 1.0? The current version 0.11.6 is fairly old now and 1.0 contains a few improvements that would be nice. (e.g., support for multiple git repos so we could see patches to libraries as well).
Cheers, David. On 29 January 2013 09:39, Ian Lynagh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:19:36AM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: >> | The discussion about replacing abbot seems to be achieving consensus. >> | There's no urgency, but if it seems to taper out again then I'll try >> | prodding the committee to put the plan into action. >> >> What *is* the consensus? > > To get a Hetzner server, and run a bunch of VMs on it for the different > services. > > I think everyone's agreed on that, but there's some discussion about how > best to handle backups. > >> We should get on with this. It bit several times recently, and we don't want >> to wait until it becomes really serious! (And it looks bad.) > > Replacing abbot isn't related to the recent problems with abbot. We want > to replace it because the hardware is a few years old and out of > warranty, but the recent problems were software issues and would > probably affect the replacement in the same way. > > > Thanks > Ian > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
