On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:50:13PM +0000, Geoffrey Mainland wrote: > I don't want to bike shed, but the prevalence of empty merge commits in > the repo seems both undesirable and avoidable. I always rebase my work > instead of merge. Is there a reason this is not standard practice in the > repo? It certainly makes for a nicer history.
I generally rebase when I'm sure my local patches are only in one repo, but when I've been push/pulling between different machines I don't think it's worth the hassle. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
