On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm ok with changing my workflow if that'd give better history. But > someone would need to explain the new workflow carefully on the wiki. At > the moment my general plan is: > > * make some changes > * commit as patches > * validate > * pull > * fix conflicts > * revalidate if the conflicts look at all suspicious > * push > It ought to be the same, with pull replaced with pull --rebase. That being said it's late here and I haven't thought it over carefully. I suggest you try it on a small change first. :)
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
