+1 for inclusion. This is a nicely opt-in feature, and so (barring any regressions) only those intrepid people who want it will be affected.
Richard On Jan 6, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 06.01.2014, 12:42 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones: >> We could put it in the release with warnings saying "the exact >> details, esp of syntax, might change, but do try it". I'd be ok with >> that, and we've done it before. >> >> What do other people think? > > This feature may be so good that people will use it in, say, released > libraries, disregarding the warning. > > But it seems that any possible syntax change will only affect those who > define pattern synonyms, and not those who use them, and hence only > cause work for those disregarding the warning, I’m in favor of > inclusion. > > Greetings, > Joachim > > > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner > [email protected] • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > Jabber: [email protected] • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C > Debian Developer: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
