Of course. That's how I've been keeping up with GHC proper all along. On Jan 8, 2014 7:09 AM, "Mateusz Kowalczyk" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/01/14 23:05, Dr. ÉRDI Gergő wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Wow, so, I thought there would be some back-and-forth, then a decision, > > then I would go and walk the last mile and then formally submit the patch > > for review - and now I see that in <2 days all that has passed... > > > > Of course I'll make validate pass, I just didn't even know about it. > > Likewise, I needed the carrot of 7.8 inclusion dangling before me to > start > > writing the user docs. > > > > One problem, though, is that I'll be on holiday from tomorrow, so I'll > only > > have time to look into this tonight before next weekend. I'll try my best > > to fix up validate tonight, and I'll write the docs (which I hope will > > mostly be an editing job on the wiki) next week. How does that sound? > > > > Thanks, > > Gergo > > Hi Erdi, > > I'm hoping to push in some stuff for Haddock in few hours (or rather, > have someone do it for me) but I know you have changed a few things in > it for the pattern synonyms stuff. I looked at the changes and they > weren't big and shouldn't clash. Is it fine with you to push the changes > on our side and then have you merge on top of that or would you prefer > to have it done another way? > > Thanks > > > -- > Mateusz K. > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
