On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Bardur Arantsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Further, I don't think the aeson DDoS problem was predicated on an > old/obsolete "base" library? Maybe I'm wrong about that, and I'm sure > y'all will be happy to point out where and why. :) > I may be misremembering, but I thought one of the complaints about aeson adding scientific to its dependencies (to fix the DDoS) was that it required a newer ghc? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
