Jan Stolarek <jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl> writes: > Ben, > >> 1. Should this feature be placed behind a LANGUAGE pragma? > > No, I don't think it should. I consider it a tiny addition to > TypeFamilies that is not worth having its separate pragma. Injective > TFs are fully backwards compatible, so no existing code > will be broken. > That being said, it does claim new syntax and consequently would be rather difficult to back out if we realize that this implementation isn't the right direction. I don't have a strong opinion here, just playing devil's advocate.
>> 2. Could you perhaps add some text to better motivate the feature in
>> the users guide?
> Done. Tell me whether you like the new version.
>
Definitely better. Thanks for the quick turnaround!
> BTW do we still have nightly builds of User's Guide?
>
I have a script that I periodically run to push the documentation from
my test builds here:
http://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/master/users-guide//
It's updated pretty close to daily.
Cheers,
- Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
