> On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:50 PM, Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.sc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > * Template Haskell: Not portable. Staging issues make it hard to use > as a drop-in replacement for the `deriving` keyword
I do not understand "not portable" here. Do you mean that some architectures don't support TH? What staging issues? I'm imagining here having `deriving Blah` be surface syntax that desugars into some TH splice. You keep the nice user-facing syntax, but make the deriving mechanism itself specified in TH code. It's an interesting idea, but one probably best tackled after the current proposal. Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
