Takenobu Tani <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Ben, Joachim, > > 2016-10-29 1:36 GMT+09:00 Ben Gamari <[email protected]>: >> > There is a box „committer flow“. What exactly is meant by that? Is >> > there more to be said about that? >> > >> I think this means someone with commit bits simply pushing a patch >> without submitting to code review. Ideally we'd be able to deprecate >> this workflow in favor of the "auto-validating push" that you've >> proposed. > > I assumed that "committer flow" is simply pushing a patch without > submitting to code review or without discussion. > I thought committers [1] have the authority in case of typo or small > modification. > > Do I misunderstand?
Nope, that's exactly right. Unfortunately, even "trivial" fixes have a tendency to break the tree (which has been happening too often recently) so I'm trying to push contributors to use CI whenever possible. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
