Hi, Am Samstag, den 29.10.2016, 21:36 +0900 schrieb Takenobu Tani: > Hi Ben, Joachim,
> > 2016-10-29 1:36 GMT+09:00 Ben Gamari <[email protected]>: > > > There is a box „committer flow“. What exactly is meant by that? Is > > > there more to be said about that? > > > > > I think this means someone with commit bits simply pushing a patch > > without submitting to code review. Ideally we'd be able to deprecate > > this workflow in favor of the "auto-validating push" that you've > > proposed. > > I assumed that "committer flow" is simply pushing a patch without > submitting to code review or without discussion. > I thought committers [1] have the authority in case of typo or small > modification. > Do I misunderstand? I see. The term “flow” suggested something deeper or more structured (which might be good, but is not the case). Maybe relabel it “direct commit”. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner [email protected] • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: [email protected] • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
