Hi, Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 19:48 +0000 schrieb Michal Terepeta: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari: > > > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse` (making > > > > it possible to use some libraries for it). > > > > > > > This would be great. This would allow me to drop a submodule from my own > > > performance monitoring tool. > > > > Exists since last April: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/nofib-analyse > > > > Only the binary so far, though, but good enough for > > "cabal install nofib-analyse". > > Oh, interesting! But now I'm a bit confused - what's the relationship > > between https://github.com/nomeata/nofib-analyse and > https://git.haskell.org/nofib.git, e.g., is the github repo the > upstream for nofib-anaylse and the haskell.org one for the other parts > of nofib? Or is the github one just a mirror and all patches should go > to haskell.org repo?
my repo occasionally pulls in the nofib-analyse directory from the haskell.org nofib repo; see for example this commit (especially its message): https://github.com/nomeata/nofib-analyse/commit/8225e0dd84c3c31cd156d10df75ea47ea29eda87 So yes, patches go to the haskell.org nofib repo (or Phab or whatever). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
