Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeraga...@gmail.com> writes: > I think we may want two different weights "high" and "highest". > > - Highest: regressions, incorrect results, runtime panics/crashes. These are > release blockers. > - High: other bugs > > Other than that this sounds good to me. > A fair point. Sounds fine to me.
> I don't remember how many kinds of priorities we had in trac but IIRC it used > to > work well, I think we can just copy the old priorities as labels. > Trac had lowest, low, normal, high, and highest, IIRC. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
