Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <ghc-devs@haskell.org> writes: > Hang on. > > | > * P::High would be category (1) > | > * P::Low would be category (2) > | > * No P::* label would imply categoy (3) > > Let's have P:High, P:Medium, P:Low, with no "P:" label meaning "no one > has assigned it a priority yet". > > It's very important to be able to distinguish "no one has assigned a > priority" from "priority has been assigned as low". > The initial thought was that a ticket without the "needs triage" label would have a valid priority. Consequently a ticket without "needs triage" and no "P::*" label would have medium priority.
However, while writing this it does seem that this is a non-trivial invariant that leaves a bit too much implicit. Perhaps an explicit P::normal label is best. I'll update the script. Cheers, - Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
