Ben Gamari <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Herbert, > > Last week I did some work to clean up and document GHC's head.hackage > infrastructure. At this point we have a full CI pipeline, including > automatic deployment of a Hackage repository. > > I asked on #ghc and there was quite some appetite to use > gitlab.haskell.org:ghc/head.hackage as the head.hackage upstream > repository to eliminate confusion and enjoy the benefits of having merge > requests checked via CI. Moreover, this would significantly simplify the > process of testing GHC against head.hackage as it would eliminate the need > to pull from a separate upstream repository. > > Would you be okay with moving head.hackage's upstream? > > Thanks again for everything you have done in the head.hackage area. > I probably should mention that I have documented our infrastructure in two blog posts which I hope to publish this week or next [1,2].
Cheers, - Ben [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/homepage/merge_requests/16 [2] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/homepage/merge_requests/29
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
