Count me among the people who are eagerly awaiting this move. If I understood Ben correctly when discussing this idea with him on #ghc, then one of the benefits of having head.hackage on GitLab would be that the head.hackage index would automatically regenerate any time a commit lands. This would make things far more streamlined than the status quo, where the index has to be regenerated by hand.
If head.hackage is migrated over to GitLab, would that change how people are expected to use it? That is, would it still be as simple as copying the repository stanza from [1] into one's cabal.project file? Or would that change with a move to GitLab? Ryan S. ----- [1] http://head.hackage.haskell.org/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
