Thanks a lot Vlad and Shayne, that indeed did the trick! Out of curiosity, how could I have figured out that this was the culprit? The parse error I got was a bit puzzling, and I couldn't find any flags that would give more information (I think I was looking for the parser equivalent of -ddump-tc-trace).
Best, Csongor > On 29 Aug 2020, at 00:51, Shayne Fletcher <shayne.fletcher...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:48 PM Shayne Fletcher <shayne.fletcher...@gmail.com > <mailto:shayne.fletcher...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Vladislav Zavialov <vladis...@serokell.io > <mailto:vladis...@serokell.io>> wrote: > Hi Csongor, > > I believe the reason for this failure is that a -> @m b gets parsed as a > -> @(m b). > Why is that? Because a ‘btype’ includes type-level application. > > If you replace the ‘btype’ after PREFIX_AT with an ‘atype’, this particular > issue should go away. At least that’s my hypothesis, I haven’t tested it. > > > I confirm that this is correct and with that change the example string > reduces as hoped. > > > - Vlad > > Also, with that correction there are no new shift/reduce conflicts. The > original rule gave rise to 3. > > -- > Shayne Fletcher
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs