Hi Brandon, I’m afraid your analysis is not entirely correct. The shift/reduce conflict is not on @ but after it.
- Vlad > On 29 Aug 2020, at 14:42, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another way to figure it out is the shift/reduce conflict on @, which tells > you it had two ways to recognize it. "Reduce" here means returning to your > parser rule, so "shift" means btype wanted to recognize the @. Inspecting > btype would then have shown that it was looking for a type application. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
