It wasn't really a personal attack, it was a pure statement of fact and an 
attribution of (highly hypothetical) possible outcome. You can argue about the 
correct target for this attribution, but to me the director of the HF is the 
person responsible for anything the HF does and is the ultimate decision maker. 
I don't want to delve too much into the bylaws about that, the power dynamics 
ultimately depend less on the theoretical structure and more on everyone's 
personal actions. I am as baffled as Julian about the outcome, but I also admit 
perhaps no one in the HF even realizes this is a problem to be taken seriously. 
However if this position does not change I strongly suggest exploring 
possibilities for changing the board.
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to