using 93c flag was enough to compile, hopefully I looked a bit at purity management. I think I can do something, to add a flag that does not rise an error in case of purity brokeness (related to files and now function at least)
I'll do it later thanks for the 93c tip Lionel On lun, 2008-08-11 at 23:00 +0200, SAINTE CLUQUE Lionel wrote: > Dear All, > > Im testing ghdl on a quite big design (some Mo of code for description, > testbenches, tcl scripts and testbench file scenari) > > My major problem is related with purity. Many file operations leads to > breaking purity of functions and ghdl complains about that. > > What I will say is very stupid, but the problem is that the design > compiles under modelsim, and not under ghdl... > I am OK to write code that respects the standard, but some of the broken > fuctions are written by altera itself. I would prefer not to modify part > manufacturer's code. This is both long and subtle. > > If I summarise my questions: > Is there any option to relax ghdl regarding file usage? > Is there any coding style that permits to preserve purity of > functions/procedures, while using files? > > Thanks for your attention > > Lionel > _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
