Hi, Could it be that the file IO is the culprit here? Did you log all signals in your comparison simulation?
Mikael Hjelm -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Welton Sent: den 22 september 2009 11:26 To: GHDL discuss list Subject: Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Interest in Accelerating GHDL If you mean processes that have wait statements rather than a sensitivity list, then these are used very rarely. I was only able to count three, and even these are not active at all after the simulation has loaded RAMs at time zero. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Sailer Sent: 21 September 2009 17:58 To: GHDL discuss list Subject: Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Interest in Accelerating GHDL On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 17:55 +0100, Paul Welton wrote: > The bad news is that the simulation took two hours, whereas on a How many non-sensitized processes does your simulation use? Tom _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss - This message is subject to Imagination Technologies' e-mail terms: http://www.imgtec.com/e-mail.htm Imagination Technologies Ltd is a limited company registered in England No: 1306335 Registered Office: Imagination House, Home Park Estate, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8LZ. Email to and from the company may be monitored for compliance and other administrative purposes. - _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss ---------------------------- This E-mail is Virus scanned ---------------------------- _______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
