Yes, I know of the .ghw format. (That is what I am using at the moment).
However, for large waveform dumps, the .ghw format is terribly slow to
the point were it is unusable.

2016-04-24 1:10 GMT+02:00 Lehmann, Patrick <patrick.lehm...@tu-dresden.de>:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> if you need more features in the exported waveform database files, there is
> also the *.ghw (GHDL wave) format, which is also supported by GTKWave.
>
> ghdl -r ..... --wave=waveform.ghw
>
> Regards
>      Patrick
>
> -----------------------------------
> Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft
> Technische Universität Dresden
> Fakultät Informatik
> Institut für Technische Informatik
> Lehrstuhl VLSI-Entwurfssysteme, Diagnostik und Architektur
> 01062 Dresden, GERMANY
> Tel.:  +49 351 463-38451                                       Fax:  +49 351
> 463-38324
> E-Mail: patrick.lehm...@tu-dresden.de
> WWW:    http://vlsi-eda.inf.tu-dresden.de
>
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Stefan Dröge
> Datum:24.04.2016 00:15 (GMT+01:00)
> An: ghdl-discuss@gna.org
> Betreff: [Ghdl-discuss] Improved '.fst' file format for VHDL
>
> Some changes/additions were recently made to gtkwave's .fst file
> format, which can now also support 9 value logic, and special VHDL
> types like records, etc. (see gtkwave manual page 21).
>
> Since the .fst file format shows better performance for larger
> waveform dumps, it would be very useful if these changes could be
> included in GHDL. For the implementation it might be interesting to
> have a look at https://github.com/nickg/nvc/blob/master/thirdparty/fstapi.c
> (I could not find any information on the fst format directly from the
> gtkwave website, besides the user manual)
>
> Lastly, since I am new to the mailing list, let me say a big "thank
> you!" to the Tristan and the other contributers. I am using ghdl
> extensively for my master thesis project. I am writing a GPS receiver
> in VHDL, including a MBlite Softcore CPU (a microblaze variant), and I
> am doing my simulations exclusively in GHDL. I especially like the
> performance of ghdl and that it is very pedantic about the LRM. My
> life would be several orders of magnitudes harder without GHDL.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ghdl-discuss mailing list
> Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ghdl-discuss mailing list
> Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss

Reply via email to