On 2014-08-13 at 23:52, John Sullivan wrote: > I think what you are criticizing would indeed be objectionable but is > not the way such policies work. Any disputes will still be resolved by > the event organizers.
I didn't consider the clause "at the discretion of the organizers"; I have to concede that it does make a difference. > Yes, let's assume good faith -- including on the part of those who might > raise concerns or support such policies. I don't think anybody wants to sabotage the meeting; I just think that the policy idea is very ill-advised. The balance up to this point is one interesting talk lost. We'll see if there is anything gained as well. -- Luca Saiu http://ageinghacker.net * GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon * Vaucanson: http://vaucanson-project.org * Marionnet: http://marionnet.org
